Paranormal agency 2 the ghosts of whane tv#

The investigative shows, however, are supposed to be seeking out hard evidence and it’s been a while since I’ve seen a good one. Awesome entertainment, and makes me imagine myself in that situation. They capture my attention and have some creep-factor too. I’m sure they stretch the truth to make the stories more interesting. I prefer watching the biographic-type paranormal shows. It’s been very helpful over the years and much appreciated. Thank you for keeping this list up to date. I myself was the victim of repeated demonic attacks back in the 80’s but have since received the Lord Jesus Christ as Savior.ĭont be foolish, saying that “I have never experience anything paranormal, therefore it doesnt exist.” Many of the stories told on these programs are from persons who were completely skeptical until it happened to them. then you must ask yourself, what are these people truly experiencing? I will tell you that what people are truly experiencing, if at all, is demonic activity manifesting in many ways. Some may be embellishing, and some may be completely dishonest, but you cannot rule all accounts as hoaxes. I focus on shows like Animal Planets “The Haunted,” and “Celebrity Ghost Stories” which give first hand accounts to supernatural occurrences. Forget the clowns on television doing investigations. Countless testimonies to the fact that peoples lives were genuinly affected, and sometimes ruined (broken marriages, families.). You simply cannot disregard the mountainous evidence of the supernatural. I’ve not seen most of them, but are there any good skeptical shows to counter the nonsense? The titles don’t suggest much hope, but Randi’s show is a nice beacon (though unfortunately long gone).Īnd here I thought the constant rain in Indiana was depressing… It makes rational people have to be that much more cautious and work that much harder to separate fact from nonsense (not that this paranormal subject matter is particularly difficult).Įven just looking at the chronological order and quantity progression is sad. While any network is bad, seeing these shows on Discovery, History, Travel Channel and Nat Geo is utterly disheartening and infuriating. It was during Easter with a crowd of people so I didn’t catch all of it, but nothing I saw indicated an attempt at rationality. There was a show on the history channel last night about hauntings… I wish I were surprised by it. I work with people who take the ghost hunting shows seriously and it is mind boggling. With science in schools deteriorating, kids watching an increasing amount of television at home (at least as far as I’m aware) and more shows like this being presented under the guise of proper research, it is so very important for skepticism to make its way to younger generations. This all seems like a rather frightening descent into ignorance.

NBC anchor Brian Williams has finally been suspended without pay amid a firestorm of criticism over false claims he was inside a helicopter that was gunned down over Iraq. Which I can state after living in both of these cities a total load of rubbish. The fact is “ALL” news stories need to be cross checked for any kind of accuracy.Īs most media outlets are following someone’s political agenda.įox News that stated as fact, that Birmingham, BradfordĪnd other major cities in England and Europe where “no go areas” due to Muslim extremism.

Why only a select few, mostly Russian news agencies from what I can see and the usual small time suspects.

Paranormal agency 2 the ghosts of whane tv#

If you actually believe this is so, then why don’t you include all the other major TV news stations and media outlets in your media guide to scepticism? Why don’t you include CNN, ABC, CBS, BBC, ITV, SKY, Fox News (sorry Fox opinions also owned by the Sun newspaper group / Murdoch) the Express, the Telegraph, or any of the other major corporate owned media outlets….